top of page
Jennison Corporation logo

Aerospace Sheet Metal Stamping and CNC Machined Parts: Why Single-Source Manufacturing Matters

  • Feb 4
  • 6 min read
abstract sheet metal image

Last year, an aerospace buyer sent us a bracket that had already been to two shops. The first shop stamped it. The second shop was supposed to machine three precision holes, but they couldn't fixture the formed part repeatably. Tolerances wandered. The buyer rejected the lot, ate the lead time, and started over.


One part. Two vendors. Zero usable pieces.


That bracket didn't need a better machining shop. It needed one shop that could stamp it, machine it, and inspect it without the part ever leaving the building. The stamping department knows how the part was formed. The machining department doesn't have to reverse-engineer someone else's work. Quality writes one report, not two.


This is what single-source aerospace manufacturing actually solves. Not a minor convenience in vendor management, but a fundamental reduction in the places where parts, schedules, and documentation fall apart.


Aerospace Certifications: The Entry Requirement


Before discussing capability, aerospace buyers need assurance that a supplier's quality system meets program requirements.


AS9100 is the aerospace quality standard. It builds on ISO-9001 but adds configuration management, risk management throughout product lifecycle, product safety processes, and counterfeit part prevention. These fundamentally change how a shop documents work, manages design changes, and traces components back to source material.


ASTM material standards add another layer. Specifying material to ASTM standards means specifying alloy composition, testing methods, documentation, and traceability chains for every material lot. A shop capable of machining an alloy might still fail if it can't produce mill certifications, test reports, and lot traceability ASTM demands.


Jennison's quality system builds on ISO-9001 and extends to AS9100 aerospace standards and ASTM material compliance. We maintain ITAR registration and meet DFARS requirements, both critical for aerospace programs with defense applications. For defense-specific compliance details, see our separate article.


Three Scenarios Where Single-Source Stamping and CNC Matters


For a comparison of stamping, CNC machining, and laser cutting as individual processes, see our separate guide. But aerospace components often need both processes. Here's where single-source matters most:


Stamped Parts With Precision Secondary Features


A stamped bracket comes off the press with form, holes, and basic features. The print then calls for reamed holes at ±0.001", tapped threads at specified depth and class of fit, or machined datums for assembly reference. These features exceed stamping capability.


Split across two vendors, and the machining shop receives a formed part, not flat stock. Fixturing formed parts is harder, less repeatable, and more time-consuming than fixturing raw material. You now manage two vendors, two inspection reports, two schedules, and quality coordination between unaligned shops.


A single-source shop stamps the part, moves it directly to a machining center, and cuts precision features in-house. One quality system. One documentation package. One contact when changes occur.


Volume Production With Machined Details


You need 50,000 stamped parts per year, each with a machined feature: counterbore, precision slot, or tapped hole. A stamping-only shop subs the machining. You pay a markup, lose machining schedule visibility, and chase quality issues across two companies.


A combined shop runs both operations under one roof. Stamping and machining departments share the same production schedule, quality team, and delivery urgency.


Prototype-to-Production Transition


Early aerospace programs start with small quantities fully CNC machined from solid billet. Machining makes sense at low volume: no tooling investment, fast turnaround, easy iteration. Once design stabilizes and production scales, economics shift. Stamping with CNC secondary operations produces parts faster and cheaper than full CNC machining.


A single-source shop manages this transition internally. The same engineers who machined prototypes design production stamping tooling. The same quality team writes the inspection plan. You avoid re-qualifying a new supplier mid-program, a process that takes months in aerospace.


What's Actually on the Shop Floor


Capability claims are cheap. Equipment is verifiable.


Jennison operates 18 machining centers with continuous capacity: horizontal and vertical mills handling components to 50" x 26" x 25", live tooling lathes for complex turned parts, and vertical turning capability to 32.7" on our Doosan Puma V8300. This is genuine working capacity, not idle inventory. Continuous operation means we absorb production schedules when aerospace timelines tighten and can commit to consistent lead times. Stamping presses range from 5 to 220 tons, all tooling designed, built, and maintained in-house. In-house tooling control matters in aerospace: it means we modify dies, adjust pressure, and implement design changes without waiting for external vendors or coordinating across multiple shops. See our equipment list on the capabilities page.


Single-roof stamping and CNC isn't convenience; it's production architecture. When stamping finishes, parts move directly to machining without packaging, shipping, receiving, or incoming inspection at another facility. This eliminates handling damage, transit time, and external vendor overhead. Parts moving to second locations introduce cumulative variability: environmental changes affecting dimensions, handling damage from repeated movement, schedule delays while waiting in receiving queues, and quality coordination burden when issues arise between unaligned shops. Single-source eliminates all of this and ensures consistent scheduling pressure across departments.


Inspection That Matches the Manufacturing Precision


Tight tolerances mean nothing if you can't verify them. Aerospace programs require documented evidence that every dimension, feature, and material property meets specification.


Jennison uses Zeiss CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) systems for precision verification. CMM measures complex 3D geometry directly against CAD models, verifying features conventional hand gauges can't reliably check. For a reamed hole at ±0.0005" or a machined datum serving as assembly reference, CMM provides documented compliance proof.


We also operate vision inspection systems for surface and dimensional verification, particularly useful for stamped features, edge conditions, and surface characteristics CMM doesn't capture.


For first production parts on aerospace programs, we produce First Article Inspection (FAI) reports documenting that every dimension, material, and process requirement on the drawing is met on the actual production part. FAI is standard for aerospace production and requires adequate inspection equipment and quality systems to generate accurately.


The ability to inspect to your manufactured tolerance separates capable shops from guessing. If a shop machines a feature to two tenths but verifies only to a thou, they don't know if the part is good. This gap matters more in aerospace production than most procurement teams recognize. You can't ship parts you can't prove.


Design Review Before Tooling Commitment


In aerospace, a design change after tooling is built costs money and can restart the qualification cycle. Programs with 12 to 18 month timelines can't absorb tooling redesign mid-program.


Jennison's team reviews customer prints before quoting and before tooling commitment. When tolerance callouts don't make practical sense for the process, we flag them. Sheet metal can't hold blanket tight tolerances everywhere. Some features relax through forming. Impossible tolerances drive up cost and scrap.


Catching a tolerance issue before tooling is built is a conversation. Catching it after is a program delay. For how design decisions drive manufacturing cost, see our full DFM guide.


Aerospace and Defense Applications


Jennison produces precision stamped and machined components for aircraft, aircraft carrier, and submarine programs. Combined stamping and CNC capability addresses defense aerospace requirements where supply chain simplification and consolidated compliance documentation are priorities, not preferences.


When a program requires components from specialty alloys, held to tight tolerances, documented to aerospace standards, and produced under ITAR and DFARS compliance, a single vendor handling stamping, machining, and inspection eliminates coordination burden.


If your parts need both stamping and CNC machining, have Jennison run the entire workflow under one roof. Send us your drawings for a no-obligation review. We'll tell you if your tolerances align with the specified processes.


Frequently Asked Questions


Does Jennison meet AS9100 standards for aerospace work?


Jennison meets aerospace quality requirements including AS9100 standards and ASTM material compliance. Our quality system builds on ISO-9001 and extends to configuration management, traceability, and documentation that aerospace customers demand.


Can Jennison handle both stamping and CNC machining on the same part?


Yes. We run 18 machining centers 24 hours a day alongside stamping presses from 5 to 220 tons, all under one roof in Carnegie, Pennsylvania. Parts move from stamping press to CNC machine to inspection without leaving our facility.


What CNC machining capacity does Jennison operate?


Our machining department includes horizontal and vertical machining centers, live tooling lathes, and vertical turning capability up to 32.7" on our Doosan Puma V8300. We handle components up to 50" x 26" x 25" on our vertical machining centers.


What inspection equipment does Jennison use for aerospace parts?


We use Zeiss CMM systems for precision verification and vision inspection systems for surface and feature measurement. These verify complex geometries against CAD models and produce documented inspection reports (including First Article Inspection reports) that aerospace programs require.


Will Jennison review my drawings before I commit to tooling?


Yes. Our team reviews customer prints for manufacturability before quoting and flags tolerance callouts or design features that don't make sense for the intended process. In aerospace, catching these issues before tooling gets built protects your schedule and budget.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page